Marilyn Booth
Director, Program in South Asian and Middle Eastern Studies
| When Naguib Mahfouz was awarded the 1988 Nobel Prize for Literature, at the age of 77 and after a long and prolific career as a novelist and short story writer, it focused world attention on Arabic literature and made literature hot news in the Arab world. Literature was—and always is—political, and intellectuals throughout the Arab world debated commitment and censorship. Mahfouz’s support for the U.S.-led Camp David Accords had made him unpopular in some quarters, but his works (and the many films made from them) were too popular to make an ensuing boycott successful. The Nobel was seen by Arabs as partly a political move, though many were proud that a venerable Arab author had received it. People asked: Was Mahfouz being rewarded by the | |
| West for supporting the Camp David Accords? In an earlier decade, his controversial 1959 novel Awlad Haratuna (translated as Children of Gebelawi) was banned in Egypt for its forthright questioning of the meaning and existence of God in a science-driven world.
Throughout his career, Mahfouz—who died at the age of 94 at his home in Cairo on August 30, 2006—exemplified the ways literary writing is part of the political history of a nation, and his career traces the maturation of a national prose literature in Egypt that helped to shape Egyptians’ sense of place in the world, from struggles against British imperialism to the socialist regime of the post-1952 Free Officers, to the turn toward capitalist enterprise under Presidents Sadat and Mubarak. His novels and stories, beloved throughout the Arab world, are powerful texts that many U.S.-based high school and college-age students are reading in literature and history classes, as are students in the Arab world. Mahfouz’s early environment was that of an urban middle stratum, strongly bound to Cairo’s medieval city, retaining ties to the traditional crafts production and mercantile economy while beginning to enter the state educational system instituted during the nineteenth century and taking up jobs in the civil service. Mahfouz was born into a merchant family, the youngest of nine children, in the old quarter of al-Jamaliyya. When he was six, the family moved to one of the new European-style neighborhoods, but Mahfouz retained a loyalty to the old city, where many of his novels are set (and from its streets and quarters take their titles: Midaq Alley, Khan al-Khalili, Palace Walk). He went to school and university in Cairo and was embarking on a graduate degree in Philosophy. But writing essays for the press, notably the journal of the reformer and writer of a socialist bent Salama Musa, Mahfouz gradually turned to writing fiction, as well as reading widely in English, French, and Russian literature, as did many Arab intellectuals of the time. Naguib Mahfouz’s early adulthood was a time when concerns about social justice in a rapidly changing society were paramount, a focus evident in the era’s literature. His earliest fictional writings addressed such concerns but in a historical framework that allowed indirect criticism of the tenor of Egyptian society and rule at the time: his three novels of the 1930s, set in Pharaonic times (Rhadopis of Nubia, Khufu’s Wisdom, Thebes at War, recently available in English translation), were designed as the start of a historical series focused on ancient Egypt. Contemporary concerns soon overwhelmed his historical interests, though. He began to publish novels that took up the life of Cairenes during a time of turmoil, from the depression of the 1930s through the upheavals of World War II. One of his best-known novels, Midaq Alley (1947), narrates the scattering of lives during wartime and the pressures of poverty and desire. This novel, says critic Roger Allen, “established a new yardstick for social-realist fiction in Arabic.” Mahfouz had taken up a career as a civil servant; he worked in the Ministry of Pious Endowments, briefly, and then in the Ministry of Culture. When I interviewed Mahfouz in Cairo in late 1989, I asked him why he had chosen this line of work. He noted the impossibility of living from one’s writing. “So I had to find a job. I wanted to make sure it was a job that wouldn’t take all my time. I had the choice of working as a clerk or a teacher. I preferred to be a clerk. Why? The clerk works from eight in the morning until two pm, and then goes home. And the work is mechanical. Not like a teacher’s work.” Mahfouz even worked briefly as an arts censor! The Minister of Culture at the time, Mahfouz told me, was an art lover, and “he wanted to put someone in the censorship post who was also a lover of the arts.” Mahfouz was transferred after nine months in the position. It was only with the publication in 1956-57 of the famous Cairo Trilogy (in English: Palace Walk, Sugar Street, and Palace of Desire) that Mahfouz became famous, receiving the Egyptian State Prize for Literature in 1957. The trilogy traces a Cairo family through three generations, from World War I, through the height of the nationalist struggle and then World War II. Its detailed and accessible evocation of family relationships, ideological struggles and professional dilemmas, in the context of the nationalist movement, rapid social change, and wartime hardship, remains one of the highlights of modern Arabic—and indeed, world—literature. When I interviewed Mahfouz, I asked him about the parallels he and critics have seen between his own life and that of the Trilogy’s young protagonist, Kamal. “The part of me that is in Kamal is his intellectual crisis—because this was the crisis of a whole generation,” responded Mahfouz. “Our generation was brought up on traditions and deep-rooted customs, and after that we found ourselves facing Western science. It was a crisis of reconciling the two. The same attempt… took 200 years in Europe. Of course it was a crisis here, too—it had to be.” Mahfouz had finished writing the Trilogy before the 1952 revolution and Nasser’s accession to power, and it was seven years before he published again. His early enthusiasm for Egypt’s first post-imperial government, like that of many intellectuals, gradually gave way to disenchantment. His 1959 Children of Gebelawi, mentioned above, heralded a change, and his short, impressionistic novels of the 1960s (as appealing to students as are the earlier, “social realist” ones) probed the psychological world of the individual alienated from society through both the brutality of a regime and the increasingly individualist desires of its subjects: two fine examples available in translation are The Thief and the Dogs and Autumn Quail. For Mahfouz, as for Arab intellectuals across the region, the June 1967 War shattered the hopes sown by postcolonial regimes. Like many, he was left silent by this collective Arab tragedy, but when he did once again write, it was to evoke disillusionment through sometimes enigmatic symbolism, sometimes sharp focus on local social and political shortcomings, and an exploration, later on, of alternative spiritual paths, notably Sufism, a mystic tradition within Islam, emphasizing the believer’s personal devotion to the divine. Throughout his long career, Mahfouz seemed to delight in the twists and turns of new explorations, new spiritual and creative paths through and beyond his adored Cairo. Quotations from Marilyn Booth, “Naguib Mahfouz: The Continuing Struggle,” Index on Censorship 19: 2 (Feb. 1990), 22-25. | |